Are Secret Ballots Required for EBA Votes? Fair Work Rules

Thursday, 23 April 2026, 5:15 pm

Are Secret Ballots Required for EBA Votes? Fair Work Rules
BlogElectionsVoting

Clients often assume there must be a strict rule somewhere saying EBA votes have to be conducted by secret ballot. It sounds like the kind of thing the law would spell out clearly.

It doesn’t.

That said, if you’ve been around enterprise bargaining for any length of time, you’ll know most experienced practitioners won’t go near an open or identifiable voting method. There’s a reason for that — and it sits in how the legislation is actually applied, not just how it’s written.

What the Fair Work Act actually says

The approval process is set out in sections 180 to 182 of the Fair Work Act 2009. If you strip it back, the requirements are fairly straightforward.

Employees must be given access to the agreement, have it explained to them in a meaningful way, and then be given the opportunity to vote. If a majority of those who cast a valid vote approve it, the agreement can move forward.

There’s no line in those sections that says “the vote must be secret”. That part is often surprising the first time you look closely.

But focusing only on what’s written in black and white misses how the Fair Work Commission approaches these applications in practice.

The real test is “genuine agreement”

When an agreement is lodged, the Commission doesn’t just check whether a vote happened. It needs to be satisfied that employees genuinely agreed to the deal.

That sounds simple, but it’s where most of the scrutiny sits.

In practical terms, the Commission will look at the overall process and ask questions like:

Did employees have a real opportunity to consider the agreement?
Was the voting process free from pressure or influence?
Can the employer demonstrate that the outcome reflects genuine choice?

This is where things get uncomfortable if the voting method isn’t confidential. Even if nothing improper actually occurred, the perception alone can raise questions.

And once those questions are on the table, you’re on the back foot.

Where secret ballots are mandatory

Interestingly, the legislation does take a firmer stance in other areas. Protected industrial action ballots are a good example.

In that context, secrecy isn’t optional — it’s required, and the process is usually run by an authorised ballot agent.

So while EBA votes aren’t treated the same way on paper, the underlying concern is identical: making sure people can vote without pressure.

The difference is that for EBAs, that expectation is enforced through the “genuine agreement” test rather than a prescriptive rule.

Why secret ballots are still the norm

In practice, most organisations don’t try to get clever here. They use secret ballots because it removes a whole category of risk.

Not theoretical risk — real, practical issues that come up more often than people expect.

Employees second-guessing whether their vote is visible
Supervisors being present during voting (even unintentionally)
Concerns raised after the fact by a small group of employees
Difficulty demonstrating the integrity of the process months later

None of these necessarily mean the vote is invalid. But they make approval harder than it needs to be.

And that’s usually the turning point — clients realise they’re taking on avoidable risk for very little upside.

How independent ballots change the equation

Using an independent provider shifts the dynamic quite a bit.

It’s not just about outsourcing the mechanics. It’s about creating distance between the employer and the vote itself.

With a properly structured system:

Voters are authenticated, but their selections remain anonymous
There’s a clear separation between who voted and how they voted
Results are independently calculated and reported
An audit trail exists if the process is ever questioned

That last point matters more than people think. EBA approvals don’t always happen immediately, and by the time questions arise, internal records are often patchy.

Having an independent record avoids that scramble.

This is essentially how providers like Vero Voting structure EBA ballots — keeping the process clean, verifiable, and separate from the employer’s internal systems.

Where things tend to go wrong

Most issues don’t come from bad intent. They come from trying to keep things simple.

An internal poll. A quick show of hands. Even emailed responses.

On the surface, they seem efficient. But they all share the same weakness — they don’t properly protect voter anonymity.

Once that’s in doubt, everything else becomes harder to defend.

And if the process is challenged, you don’t get to rewind and run it again cleanly. You’re dealing with the version that already happened.

So what’s the practical answer?

No — the Fair Work Act doesn’t explicitly require secret ballots for EBA votes.

But if the goal is to demonstrate genuine agreement and move through approval without unnecessary friction, it’s very hard to justify not using one.

That’s why, in practice, secret ballots have become the default.

If you’re preparing for an EBA vote and want to sanity-check your approach, it’s worth having that conversation early. Getting the process right upfront is a lot easier than explaining it later.

Need support with your next Elections or Voting?

Contact Us

Subscribe to our blog

Stay up to date on the latest topics for voting solutions



    Subscribe

    If you want to personalise your subscription, click here